App Preview: Image Worker Beta 23
In the near future it will no longer be necessary to go through the extra steps of moving pictures off your device and onto the computer just to make some simple edits, nor require a good data connection. An app currently in beta shows some promise of being a robust image editing app that runs locally on webOS, which has not been possible in the pre-PDK era.
With Image Worker, it will be possible to crop, rotate, and resize images. There will also be a red eye remover, both blur and sharpen filters, and some color filters for black and white, and sepia. There is an auto level color adjustment feature that presumably is supposed to act like the similarly named feature in Photoshop. Finally, there is an ‘Edge’ setting that works like the find edges filter in Photoshop. This is currently possible with Photo Effects Plus, but in that app all the edits are done on a remote server and not actually done in a webOS app. This of course requires a good data connection to work.
Read on for more - including why this app isn't quite ready for primetime... yet.
This app needs a lot of work before it is ready for prime time. The UI is barebones, there is little design that went into it. The splash screen does say that is coming though.
In my few tests of auto level feature, the result was either hardly noticeable or actually made the picture look worse. The blur, sharpen, and edge filters all were either poorly or non-functional. Furthermore, every image you edit has the words ‘evaluation version’ emblazoned across your picture so in its current state, so this app is definitely just a preview of what is to come.
Aside from this and poor or nonexistent performance of the filters, the app runs very, very slowly. It may well be the slowest app you will ever see run on your Palm device. It takes so long at times that you would wonder if it was working were it not for the useful ‘wait’ message that comes on screen. Let's hope that's a limitation of the app being in beta and not a sign that webOS PDK apps can't handle the work of editing photos.
Clearly it is not a usable app the way it is now but it shows some potential for the future. With a lot more work, this could end up being the first complete and useful image editor running on device for webOS. For now, stick with Photo Effects Plus, which can do many of these same features but requires a data connection.



























23 Comments
sooooo, TealPaint doesn't count?
Tealpaint is more an art program than a photo editor but I'll see if we can get a review of it posted, if one hasn't already been done.
What a terrible review. This app accomplishes the seemingly impossible and that is all you have to say? Did you talk to the developer at all?
This app works well on my phone. It is still a beta and from the screenshot,it looks like you are using an older version.
The only thing that makes this unusable right now is that it has not been released outside of the beta.
Try again.
It's not a review, it's a preview. Pointing out its flaws is relevant for two reasons. First, it may be an indication that image editing apps don't run well on the PDK. Second, if the beta is this bad, I personally am not optimistic for the final cut.
If this had been a review, it would have had a star rating with it, and I would have given half a star. But since it isn't finished yet, we don't review it.
This is just to let you know what's coming and what state it is currently in, and what potential it could have when it is finished.
The screenshot is taken from the beta feed. I couldn't get a screenshot of it running on my device. I wish I had, because in my test of the Edge feature, it didn't come out looking anywhere near as good as that one in the screenshot.
You say it accomplishes the impossible but if it doesn't work, what is it accomplishing? If doing this through the PDK produces an unusable app, why is it a great thing that it was done through the PDK? Why not just stick with the system that works that Photo Effects uses?
ouch..
This app is in the beta feed, which by definition means that it's still a work in progress. I'm confident that Metaviewsoft will have all these kinks worked out by the time this app hits the App Catalog. =]
Lisa Brewster
Palm Developer Relations
What a negative 'preview' of a clearly beta application.
Try version 1.2.0, MUCH faster.
Or, wait for the full version and blast that if it sucks.
I used the latest version from the beta feed. It doesn't say under about what version number it is. I downloaded it the day I tested so it was the latest version.
It's not a negative preview, it's a statement of fact. If I had said this app is great, go check it out, everyone would have been complaining that we steered you wrong.
I clearly mentioned in the very beginning that this is a beta app, and notice how many times I said it wasn't ready YET. There should not be any confusion that this is a preview of something up and coming. I don't see a point in grading apps on a curve. I tell you how it is, good or bad. Just the truth. It would'nt be fair to you, or honest, if I sugar coated everything to protect a developer's feelings. The point of telling you how bad it is now is so you know that it isn't worth using now and that you should wait until it is.
Wow. If Ms. Brewster actually responds to a review of a beta app, you know that you probably jumped the gun a little (and went too far).
Yeah, I think this one should be chalked up to a learning experience for Precentral. I can see why they were excited to review Image Worker, but if a beta doesn't seem fully baked yet, you probably should save the review for a revision that at least passes your smell test enough so that you don't completely smash it down into nonexistence.
This is not a review. It won't be reviewed until it is released.
If I put on my positive filter, I can see the author's attempt to promote the functionality of Image Worker. The review could have cut off the last four paragraphs and been good enough for a beta *preview*.
This app is unique in it's fundamental design and does a good job at native photo manipulation given the current devices. It deserves a fair chance once it is out of beta.
*Do not discount it before it is released.*
I'm done now.
We will review it when it comes out of beta. This is just a preview of what's to come and what phase of development it's in.
Am I the only one that thinks its really neat that you can print a picture over a wifi networked printer with this app? Yes says "Evaluation Version" across it and in greyscale but I have never been able to print anything directly from my Pre before. Do other apps do this and I have missed it?
It sounds like HP has an official solution for wireless printing in the works. WebOS printers, webOS phones, webOS tablets, it's an assumption but probably a safe one.
Hey, this isn't so negative. After I read his review of the 14 year old's Voogle app and it's shortcomings, I immediately purchased it...
Thank you Metaviewsoft for developing this app and for webOS!
wow, this review is kind of mean. Let's not scare away the developers.
Anybody that creates something has to expect there will be people who don't like it. If you're going to be scared away from ever doing it again, then you should never have started in the first place. A lot of people apparently don't like the level of honesty I put into this PREview. Does that mean I should feel discouraged from ever writing anything again? Should every developer who made an app that got bad ratings give up on developing?
meta is my fav dev. For making ubercalender
I'm still looking for someone to make a photo app with a cross processing filter... you know the filter that made the hipstimatic and fx camera apps so popular.
MOLO Photo Filters Pro (my app) features an xpro filter similar to the cross processing filter. You can check out the lite version for a preview of 3 other filters.
Btw: When you do a filter like blur on an image which you only see a very scaled down version (because the image itself is 2800 x 2100 pixel) you will not notice the blur effect. That's just a fact :) Scale the image down before trying the any of the soft effects, and you will see they work quite well.
That's it,
MetaView (the developer)
I agree with everything in the review but the "non-beta" version hit yesterday. I may have been the first to buy. I quickly cropped an image, enhanced a color in it and use it now as wallpaper. PROPS to the developer, MetaView! It ain't PhotoShop, but hey, the Pre ain't a desktop.