Clearwire changes relationship status with WiMax to 'it's complicated,' then Friends LTE 16
As the rest of the world, Verizon included, dedicates itself to LTE, an eye has turned to lone WiMax supporters Sprint and quasi-subsidiary Clearwire (Sprint owns 51% of the company). Unbeknownst to most, however, WiMax and LTE are actually quite similar, so much so that Clearwire CEO Bill Morrow recently told the Wall Street Journal that if they were to switch to LTE, it’d be a matter of a mere software upgrade.
While Clearwire’s Clear service is only available in more than 40 markets in 16 US states, not a single mobile phone has been released to take advantage of the high-speed mobile service (up to 10 Mbps down/5 Mbps up), mostly due to the power draw requirements. Meanwhile, Sprint has been promoting their co-developed 4G network (formerly known as Xohm) at every turn, leading to speculation that the Pre may end up with a 4G radio.
Switching to LTE would pose significant challenges for Clearwire. Firstly, they’d need to have Sprint onboard, and thus far Sprint seems satisfied with their own 4G deployments in a handful of markets. Clearwire’s deal with Sprint allows for infrastructure and spectrum sharing, along with a roaming agreement between the two. Additionally, Clearwire and Sprint would have to deal with the already deployed WiMax devices in the hands of customers, either by running a legacy WiMax network for several years, pushing out a software upgrade for those devices (likely not as easy as upgrading the towers), or by taking the expensive step of replacing all customer-owned WiMax cards with LTE cards. Of all options, running a legacy WiMax network for a few years seems to be the most likely option, giving Sprint and Clearwire the time to let those contracts expire and pull the plug.
All that is of course assuming that Clearwire even makes the switch. Why would they? For one, it’d put everybody on the same standard, and with the exception of SIM card toting LTE, neither of the competing standards have little technical advantage. But going with the pack would have distinct fiscal advantages for both network operators and device manufacturers. Imagine a world where manufacturers only have to make LTE-compatible modems and phones. No more later-for-Europe launches while somebody works on converting their CDMA phone to GSM. Sounds good, eh?
Well, it’s not all roses. For one, assuming that LTE’s power draw can be considerably decreased (or battery technology significantly improved), a LTE phone on Sprint would still have to tote EVDO, 1xRTT, and CDMA radios to ensure operability in areas where LTE support hasn’t yet been built-out. And that LTE support isn’t coming soon. Verizon is just now testing its first LTE sites in Seattle, and Clearwire and Sprint are slowly rolling out WiMax, with only a handful of markets slated for initial activation in the coming year.
So how likely are we to see a 4G phone, either WiMax or LTE, from Palm? We will, eventually, but it’s not going to be for several years. In the meantime, Clearwire, Sprint, and everybody else are going to market their services as “mobile broadband,” i.e. laptop modems and mobile base stations. And as for Sprint and Clearwire switching to LTE? It’s a possibility, especially if Deutsche Telekom AG were to purchase Sprint (Deutsche Telekom has already committed to LTE), but right now it’s not a huge possibility. The biggest obstacle to any switchover will be the installed customer base - just ask Bell Mobility how that switch from CDMA to GSM is going.




























16 Comments
love the graphic
Its going to be years before 4G will be practical for mobile phones but right now their ideal for data cards and prolly netbooks too.
Yeah, hysterical graphic. That a PreCentral original?
A great many of our graphics are. If it's amusing, it probably is. :-D
Batteries are the achilles heel to 4G adoption for mobile phones. Heck, some would argue that's the case for our current 3G smartphones.
Is there at least some promising battery technology in the pipeline somewhere or are we all just wishing for a breakthrough?
Im just going to look at this from one point and that is being the only network to use a certain tech (WiMax) will kill you and switching to LTE regardless of cost would be a logical business call. LTE will givem them better roaming coverages with the other adopters and $$ from others roaming them.
Agreed.
In the short term it would put Sprint at a disadvantage. With WiMax they are the leader in the US in 4G rollouts. If they have to switch to LTE they lose the differentiator and have to migrate their existing customer base (thankfully only mobile broadband laptop cards and not entire phones).
However, in the longer term this would be the right move for all the reasons stated in this article.
Physically the 2 are mostly identical. The big $$ for hardware swapping would only be the enduser devices.
I was surprised to hear that on the carrier's end WiMax equipment could become LTE with just a software upgrade.
Is that really the case? Other than replacing the client radio are there some other hidden costs (e.g., something akin to performance tuning and optimization)?
I thought that was odd too, but it is conceivable they are using some kind of USRP hardware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Software_Radio_Peripheral
Thanks, that sounds like very interesting technology. Not sure if that is what WiMax/LTE equipment is using though.
I found a couple of other interesting articles
WiMax / LTE myths:
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/article-68.html
The Spectrum Issue
http://www.eurocomms.com/features/112044/WIMAX_AND_LTE_-_Either_or_both%...
Here is an excerpt from the second article...
"One of the biggest obstacles to widespread WiMAX deployments is the lack of available high quality spectrum. In the US, Sprint benefits greatly from its 2.5 GHz spectrum holdings. This relatively low-frequency band allows greater coverage per base station since signals travel much further than at higher frequencies. This results in fewer base stations needed, making WiMAX cheaper to deploy in the US than in other markets that don't have access to the same spectrum."
I use Xohm for my home internet as it's cheaper than DSL or cable and it's decent. I just kind of knew from the get-go that there was a good chance they would end up shutting it off or switching the tech at some point. It was a worthy gamble to get the first 4g network out but the marketing isn't such that many people know about it and it's in limited markets still so it's not something the average commuter can buy for their laptop to have always-on broadband.
I tested the service when it first came out in Baltimore and while it was pretty cool, I didn't really need it as a mobile service because 95% of places I took my laptop had wifi available and for that other 5% I could just tether to a 3G phone and still get decent bandwidth on Sprint's EVDO Rev. A.
One cool thing is that they don't do contracts like a cell data plan. You buy it by the month or you can buy it by the day if you need it for work or something.
I don't understand this post are they basing this off new information that Clearwire is dumping WiMAX or is it just a what if speculation?
Most of it is speculation on how such a switch would go, though it was spurred by Clearwire's comments that such a switch would be an relatively feasible matter, from the technical perspective.
Thank you very much,I have read it now.
And welcome to my site,
http://www.pretty-tiffany.com
Tiffany
Tiffany 1837