Editorial: how HP could handle device management for webOS | webOS Nation
 
 

Editorial: how HP could handle device management for webOS 26

by Jonathan I Ezor Mon, 14 Mar 2011 6:45 am EDT

At a global summit later today, Leo Apotheker, the CEO of HP, is expected to detail the company's strategy going forward. From all recent indications, webOS will be a significant element of that strategy, as the shared OS ecosystem across portable devices, printers and PCs. As early as NYC Dev Day, and continuing at the ThinkBeyond and Mobile Web Congress developer events, HP (through the Palm Global Business Unit) has been encouraging developers to plan for the broader installation of webOS, especially in the enterprise. The logical question, of course, is what might be the "killer app" for that market, that would appeal across the broadest section of new customers. Here's a suggestion, with a hat tip to webOS Internals for the name: a Meta-Imager for webOS devices.

In the corporate IT world, consistency and control are mission-critical. One way that enterprises of any size can manage and support large numbers of PCs is through a standardized, often locked-down installation of OS and applications, frequently built and deployed via images that are directly installed or pushed out over the network to newly added machines. Updates can be handled in much the same way. This process of developing and deploying standard images is even more important in regulated industries and those utilizing custom applications, where user modifications can lead to data loss, work stoppages and even legal and financial penalties for non-compliance.

Before the rise of smartphones, enterprise control of mobile devices was fairly straightforward: voice and messaging could be provided through chosen cellphones, or via BlackBerry devices connected to the company's dedicated BlackBerry Enterprise Server. Access control, and data retention, was centrally managed. Carriers and manufacturers alike impose requirements on devices, and OS limitations and controls further complicate the picture. Android, for example, is tightly tied to Google for apps and data sharing, which may be problematic for some companies, and carriers have imposed their own overlays whose removal is frequently restricted. While BlackBerry maintains its strong controls, many (including HP) see them as vulnerable in the Enterprise space. Even where a company like Apple tries to market iOS as enterprise-friendly, it is still tethered in some way to Apple's iTunes infrastructure. Apple's own reference about enterprise functionality for the iPad states:

When deploying iPad in your business, it’s important to think about the role of iTunes. A few key functions require iTunes, starting with the activation of the device. After activation, iTunes isn’t required to configure or use iPad with your enterprise systems. It is, however, required for installing software updates and for creating a backup if user information ever needs to be restored or transferred to a new device. iTunes can also be used to synchronize music, video, applications, and other content. These synchronization capabilities are not required for general business use.

It is here where the inherent openness and user freedom, along with Linux underpinings, of webOS can shine, and where the model of Meta-Doctor is so instructive. Imagine a typical financial services company which faces a number of significant challenges as it seeks to deploy modern smartphones across its business. First, it has heavy regulatory requirements that mandate data retention and security. Second, its products and services are provided via custom, home-built software connected to both locally stored and cloud-based databases. Third, its employees are frequently traveling within the United States and even internationally. And fourth, different types of employees need different levels of access to information and security.

For most smartphone environments, this combination of requirements (typical of many industries) is difficult or impossible to configure and manage. Consider, though, how it might work in webOS and a desktop Meta-Imager app. With this hypothetical tool, starting with a standard webOS Doctor the way Meta-Doctor does, the IT Director could, with a few clicks, designate which standard webOS apps would or would not be installed, and could disable webOS Backup to avoid data being stored other than on the company's own servers. With a few more clicks, the company's custom apps and data sets (encrypted to industry standards via standard Linux libraries) could be selected for installation, along with the digital certificate and settings for the company's secure mail server and a TextAssist vocabulary with words and shortcuts specific to the company and its customers. An automatic GPS-based locator process could enable tracking of lost or stolen devices as might be needed, with or without notification to the user. Access controls could be designated depending on the employee's level and role, including possibly locking out the App Catalog and Developer Mode to eliminate employee alterations (similar to User vs. Administrator accounts in desktop OSes). Once the desired options are selected, the administrator could click "Done" to build a customized webOS Doctor image that could then be easily run by local offices on any new webOS device purchased, automatically configuring it to the company standard before it is given to employees. It might even be possible to redirect the System Updates app to look to the company's own custom version of webOS rather than the standard ones for new versions and features.

This type of customization and easy deployment is not only uniquely possible for webOS, but is absolutely essential for success in the enterprise market. While Palm could build this tool itself (and perhaps already has), it is also a great opportunity for developers to try to do so as well. Even without the specific regulatory and security requirements in this hypothetical, there is a real market for, say, an easy-to-use app that would help a small medical practice configure all of its webOS devices with its preferred insurers' formularies, dosage and drug references, and other essential tools, or a legal practice install billing software, client lists, research bookmarks and custom dictionaries.

WebOS is already among the easiest and most capable smartphone operating systems, and the promised features of webOS 3.0 will only add to those qualities. If enterprising developers can create user-friendly tools to help customize and manage webOS devices, developing the enterprise market will be much more likely to succeed.

Category:

26 Comments

What a great read. Outstanding editorial.

I really do hope WebOS battles through the smoke and rises to the top. It's the future, before its even happened. This is only the beginning of an endless future of web devices.

I enjoyed this editorial. Below is a post I made a few weeks ago with a webOS/Enterprise idea:

My idea of the dual profile goes like this: A person creates their HP profile and enters all personal data (gmail, facebook, etc.) as well as a company profile. The IT people can use computers (or an app) to make any settings they want, which are pushed to all phones that have that profile). For example, the company can purchase the voice memo app in bulk, and 'push' it to every device. The phones would pop up with a prompt to download the app. All of the settings can be controlled, and obviously things can be wiped from the device.

you have some very compelling ideas for sure... i am excited for todays announcement. based on the leak dates for the tab we will b seeing the pre3 in June. i can handle that. WebOS FTW

Great idea - I hope HP runs with it...

H/P needs to get out of carrier updates and start offering updates through a dedicated wifi connection directly through H/P instead of going through the carrier. Just like Apple does through iTunes.

It's my understanding that Apple still needs carrier approval, which is why AT&T iPhones were updated before the Verizon ones were. They choose to do it through iTunes, like HP chooses to do it OTA, but it is still approved by the carrier.

The only way around this is to get an unlocked phone, but even then it's not a guarantee (2.1 was released for European Pre plusses before the unlocked Pre 2)

How does Blackberry do it? Are they locked through carriers?

In many ways Blackberries are the most similar to WebOS. But Blackberries have been vulnerable in different countries to security issues.

I also think about this not just as a US/European issue, but as a GLOBAL issue. Japan, China, and India are major developing markets where cell phones have become the dominant way to access the internet. This is particularly true for small and medium size businesses.

These markets are also extremely vulnerable to viruses - including phone based viruses. As tablets, phones, and computers get integrated, this is going to be a serious issue. Apple hasn't been vulnerable yet, but it really is just a matter of time.

The iphone has not taken off in Asia, but people LOVE their cell phones. Security, integration, and a strong central app could propel WebOS forward in this market.

"Just like Apple does through iTunes."

GOD I hope not!

How about better than Apple does thru iTunes.
No PC needed. WebOSInternals already has the answer. Just needs to be implemented in production...

Looks like you can sign up for to hear the HP speach:
http://h30261.www3.hp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71087&p=irol-EventDetails&Even...

also option for security and application OTA updates from company's own dedicated servers.
Now, I have to manually upgrade and install any app update to existing company phones and hand healds.

@HP While you're working on a Meta-Imager, don't forget to add support for Bluetooth CAC Readers, s/mime email support and data (at rest) encryption of the user space storage.

nice article, lets hope that the Hp & Palm employees have the same vision. I'm wondering if Leo will say "sorry guys, I was talking about Apple when I said we will b ready to ship products just weeks after a launch!" that would b funny!

sent from my - Palm Pre -

The only problem is if they take their phone into sprint the reps will look at them with a silly grin and say that they cant help them because they have rooted their device :( Next they will try to upgrade them to the EVO 5g.

Hi all,

Among the many items that we should hear about, I am hoping these are some that make the cut:
1a. What carriers will be selling which of the newer models, (IE: TouchPad, Pre 3 & Veer).

1b. when will they be available.

1c. pricing.

2. If on Sprint can something be done for those of you who will get short changed on the upgrade situation.

3. Leo did mention a few months ago, that there would be other product announcements every few months this year.

4a. I expect at least one other keyboarded model.

4b. As well as a slab model for those that are looking for that kind of device.

5. I also would like to see an announcement dealing with package deals with touchstones and phones....

6. I would also like to see a future prototype of a product that the US Army has hired Palm/HP to design, that is a PDA/Smartphone or pocket device with a fold up or roll up screen....

7. more info on availability of apps on the webOS platform.

Take care,

Jay

more waitin? Damn two yrs and this is the thanx we get from these losers? No wonder y all these PC makers are soo out date cus they be on some other kind of timing! Week to HP = 3 months X3= 6months period! So if them F&*ks say months it's yrs since weeks are 6 months... F you HPalm!

I agree with just about everything in this article. I think it would be incredibly useful to allow business (Note: Any business, not just enterprise businesses) to generate their own install images and configure their own update servers. It would be incredibly useful. Combine that with the already existing private feeds for application updates and you could easily create a standardized ecosystem for any business. Throw in some enterprise ready devices like the TouchPad and the Pre 3 and I think you have a major winner in the enterprise space.

Nice and thoughtful article. I think that one area deserves more comment.

You wrote
...the IT Director could, with a few clicks, designate which standard webOS apps would or would not be installed, and could disable webOS Backup to avoid data being stored other than on the company's own servers. ...

However, one of the consequences of increased mobility is that it will either allow (or require, depending on how you look at it) employees to blend their professional and personal lives even more than they do now. More companies allow telecommuting, for example. The flip side of this is that employees are required to be more responsive to work demands outside of normal business hours.

Corporations will be challenged to accommodate both faces of their employees' lives by finding ways to allow both personal and professional uses of a **single** mobile device.

I'm not a techie, but isn't this where Synergy can come into play? With Synergy, my work data lives on our corporate servers, my personal data lives in the cloud, and it all looks seamless to me. As long as secure partitions (or whatever you would call them) are built into the OS (or wherever they would be built), a single device should be able to segregate corporate-approved uses from personal use and also mask that division from the user?

My colleagues all carry two phones -- a work-provided iPhone, and a personal phone. So far, I've been able to avoid that, and I'd really like to continue this way.

I just set up an 'app account' with Google yesterday for a business project. My workplace - a college - does all of their mail through Google and also run it as a business app account. Most colleges and many small businesses do, because it takes a lot of burden off of IT.

In doing so, I realized that my IT administrator has access to all of the things I use that make use of my e-mail address through anything Google related. Google Docs, e-mail, Picassa photos, personal as well as professional calendars, Google Map information I store, etc.

To separate the two spheres of my life - personal and private - I would need to set up two google profiles: professional and personal. Then I can enter all my professional information in one account and subscribe to that information (e.g. share calendars) with the other one.

Thus for the many of us who use one phone for everything, the ability to manage two profiles is absolutely essential. I just checked my WebOS calendar, and it can do that. If Synergy could do that too (it can't), it would allow both privacy and efficiency.

I am STILL using my old Palm Desktop for keeping memos straight for the many times I want to check some information while not on-line and want to TYPE and not thumb-type. I back that up using Chapura Echo. But that only works with ONE computer and will only manage ONE profile.

The old Desktop did better with the old Palms. It would sync multiple profiles. Getting that functionality back would be a big plus for those of us who don't want all of our private data shared through Google or with work.

Unfortunately, because my employer is moving to the Good software (a.k.a. GoodLink), I have been forced to purchase a non-webOS device. Since my Pre- will not get webOS 2.x, it is not likely I will ever be able to use a webOS Good client app -- if they ever released one -- on my Pre-.

*sigh* Forced to leave webOS...

First class article - and I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment.

I'm totally convinced that HP purchased Palm more than anything else as an enterprise play - they're an enterprise company and needed a way to stop IOS and Android undermining them in the enterprise, pure and simple.

HP have major advantages in this space: their size, reach and their global services division spring to mind - and if you think about it, the mobile space is still a really immature market, especially where corporations are concerned.

I can see HP doing exactly what you describe here - hey, I think they really do feel they've got a shot at the Windows crown jewels too (if they play it right). I can see why they're stoked by this.

If you look at it Apple are a consumer company with consumer focus, they just don't do enterprise (as that lame iTunes paragraph shows all too clearly). As for Google and Android, it's never going to fly for corporations when it's so, not fragmented cause I've never really believed that, so.. unfocused I think is the word. Google have put their eggs in the Chrome OS basket anyway and I'm not sure how well that's going to play out for them.

I think a few Palm fans are maybe going to be a bit disappointed where HP take the platform because, whilst they'll always have a consumer focus, it may not be as prominent as their enterprise focus over time.

Anyway, I'm pretty excited by how the whole thing is playing out - going to be great to watch!

p.s I'm actually an Android user at the minute (had a Nexus One for almost a year - rooted with numerous custom builds installed etc, as you do) but I've been totally bowled over by webOS in comparison. The only thing that put me off was the perception that the build quality of the Pre wasn't up to scratch - and then when I was about to dive in for a Pre2, something told me to hang on. I was right, I'll be buying a Pre3 and TouchPad the day they are available!

Great article. Would love to see this happen.

It's scary how intelligent Jonathan is. Very good idea there!

since Touchpad is probably not going to happen for me, iPad2 coming from the company, maybe I'll put off a new phone and wait for Pre3 x 3.
"Wait
'till I come back to your side
we'll forget the tears we cried"

Puhleees. I can't even get on my very-industry-standard network at work using my Pre (PEAP-encrypted). There ain't gonna be no enterprise presence for webOS anytime soon.

I heard thru the grapevine the Air Force at the Pentagon is testing the HP Pre 3 & TouchPad and working with HP/Palm engineers on creating some kind of configuration to disable certain features; such as cameras, tethering, etc and also implement encryption on the usb drive.

They're also testing non-camera Pre 3 and TouchPad...most of the BlackBerry devices used at the Air Force in the Pentagon do not have cameras, those that do have cameras are disabled via BEST IT Policy.

Look like webOS products could be replacing BlackBerry devices for the Air Force at the Pentagon and even on the field.