Palm Pixi First Impressions from Another Perspective | webOS Nation
 
 

Palm Pixi First Impressions from Another Perspective 26

by Annie Latham Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:58 am EST

The reviewers have been weighing in on the Palm Pixi over the last couple of weeks. Most complain about the Pixi’s speed (due to its slower processor). Others rip on it because there’s no WiFi. The screen size and resolution was bothersome too. I found that what I needed to do is take a step back and put myself into the mind of the Palm Pixi’s target audience.

The Pixi isn’t a smartphone for power users or gadget aficionados. That’s clear. In fact it seems like the Pixi IS supposed to be targeted to:

  • Smartphone newbies
  • Young people who want to step up from their feature phone
  • Centro owners looking for a replacement in a similar price bracket

So how does the Pixi stack up for this target audience? I've got a review of just that, after the break!

 Things that make the Palm Pixi conducive for the target audiences mentioned above include:

  • webOS is easy to use. Swiping and flicking is fun.
  • Apps available. There are enough to whet the appetite (as opposed to an overwhelming 100K… like where do you start?)
  • Smaller screen (2.6-inch touch screen) which is not squint-inducing for those with young eyes.
  • Sprint’s data plan is WAY affordable compared to the other carriers.
  • Candy bar-style Pixi is lighter and skinnier than the Centro. It seems like a natural upgrade with the keyboard so accessible and the slightly bigger touchscreen. Plus, addition of the ability to pinch to shrink and grow the screen (a feature so welcomed on the iPhone/iPod Touch) puts it over the top.

Weigh-off

The Palm Pixi and Tinkerbell have a lot in common – its so lightweight that seems like it can flit around effortlessly. But seriously, the tale of the kitchen scale tells no lies.

Since I own a bunch of devices, I did my own weigh-off. The kitchen scale is in grams, so here goes:

  • Pixi = 92g
  • iPod Touch = 109g
  • BlackBerry Curve 8330 (Sprint) = 114g
  • LG enV3 (Verizon) = 118g
  • Palm Centro (Sprint) = 127g
  • Palm Pre (Sprint) = 134g

See what I mean? To a Centro owner, the Pixi feels like it could fly away.

The Pixi is way thin too, though the iPod Touch has it beat. But looking at it next to the Centro, where it the thickness is equivalent to the Centro’s battery door, it is kind of impressive because so much technology is squeezed into such a small/thin package.

Test Drive 

I took the Pixi for a spin. One of the things I decided to test, based on the Katherine Boehret review appearing in The Mossberg Solution, was Pandora. I figured that was an app that Pixi users would jump on.

Pandora & The Library: I set it to play the Pink channel and plugged in my headset. Then I sat there, bopping along, trying other things like checking my webmail and doing some Google searches. Pandora continued to play as I jumped onto one of my other devices to check something. Suddenly, it stopped. So I pushed the ON button to wake up the Pixi and nothing happened. Figuring I killed the battery and it was dead, I unplugged my headset and put the Pixi into my backpack. All of a sudden, it started to play “Please don’t stop the music” (I kid you not). I quickly had to dig it out and mute it because I was doing this test drive in the San Anselmo library (don’t ask). Needless to say, I got some dirty looks. There still was juice apparently.

As for speed, sure some things loaded slowly. But considering I have been test driving apps on a BlackBerry Curve and the Palm Pre using Sprint’s Now Network, I wasn’t nearly as frustrated as I get at home when my Mac does that spinning beach ball thing while loading a page in Safari (again, don’t ask).

Thursday Night Football: To complete this first look at the Pixi, I figured I should do something really stressful like watch the NFL Network broadcast of the Miami Dolphins vs. the Carolina Panthers. In this test, I had the game on cable plus the Pre, plus the Pixi.

Looking at the game side by side by side, the Pixi was slightly behind at times. The screen was noticeably dimmer than the Pre (and obviously smaller). But I have to say it held its own EXCEPT when I tried to multi-task. If I broke away from the game to check my email, the only way to get the game back was to restart the app.

That was not the case with the Pre. Battery-wise, the Pixi hung on until Ricky Williams scored his last touchdown with like 3 minutes to go. Overall, I’d say the Pixi performed well for “Smartphone Lite.”

The College Student

Because I was on deadline to get my first impressions written up, the next thing I decided to do was hand the Pixi off to someone who fits the profile of a Pixi user: a second year student at San Jose State. I asked her to give it a 10-minute test drive and let me know what she thought. She is a feature phone person who is into text messaging.

Results? She liked it. Enjoyed the webOS gestures. Getting the hang of using the keyboard took a few minutes. The screen was readable. Maneuvering around was easy. She wanted to test it further, which to me was a good sign.


 

First Impression – Wrap-up

Personally, I liked typing in the Pixi over the Pre. To me the Pre’s lip gets in the way and slows me down. And if my hands are cold, forget it. I miss keys all the time on the Pre. The Pixi was relatively easy. My only issue is that I couldn’t see the screen to be able to tell if I did a typo. Thus, my pronouncement, that this is a smartphone for younger eyes.

As for speed, putting the Pixi in the context of a novice or non-power user, it wasn’t that bad. You can still multi-task and that puts it well ahead of much of the competiton. The ability to pinch and stretch the screen is welcomed, especially for older eyes. But it is very clear that this is supposed to be “My First Smartphone” for the younger generation: The generation that the Nissan Cube is targeting; The generation that’s dancing around with the new video-enabled iPod Nano. In fact, if Palm could enable video capability in the Pixi, it would be a sure winner for that age group.

That wraps up my first impression of the Palm Pixi. The other reviewers make excellent points that are hard to refute. But in the context of the target audiences for the Palm Pixi, it is a pretty good first try.

###

Watch for a more comprehensive review, which includes more thoughts on the Centro to Pixi upgrade, in the weeks ahead.

Some comparison shots...

This is the Palm Pixi next to the LG EnV3.

The Palm Pixi next to the iPod Touch.

26 Comments

I'm wondering how long it will take for some software optimization/GPU enabling on these devices. I'd imagine the slowness (although not multitasking memory issues) could be improved greatly. I just traded my unused HTC Touch Pro for a 32GB 1st gen iPod Touch with a guy on craigslist. The iPod Touch has a slower processor and is way older tech yet there is really no graphical lag. This makes me wonder just how long it will take for Palm to get some graphics updates out.

Playing with the Touch reminds me that I really miss a keyboard and multitasking when I don't have it but it also reminds me of what such a nice interface can act like when there is proper software optimization.

That's the thing. Once Palm opens up webOS to use the GPU things will get so much smoother! I believe this update should be coming sooner then later.

It's gonna take more than the GPU to speed up the Pixi (and the Pre). The iPod Touch is faster because the apps and interface are written and complied to native code, rather than HTML and JavaScript.

The GPU does NOT render pages.

The GPU will take a graphics hit off of the main processor, which in turn, increases speed overall...

And may i ask where the hell did you get a 32GB 1st generation iPod touch?

Craigslist apparently. I wanted to sell the Touch Pro that had been collecting dust since I got my Pre. It was barely 2 months old when I replaced it so I put it up for sale. Most buyers wanted to talk me down or scam me but one of them wanted to trade his 32gb iPod Touch. As there were no buyers I figured I would take the new toy over the dust-collecting phone and did the trade. As far as software says it is an iPod Touch gen 1 32GB. Considering it has no speaker, mic, bluetooth and a Gen 1 iPod Touch processor I assume this is correct. Comparing specs this device is slower and older than what is in my Pre so I don't feel too far out in hoping that this kind of smoothness and responsiveness can be pulled off in my preferred mobile device.

To the guy who claims it;s not due to hardware but rather programming, I just want to say that I don;t mean the games and apps (which are fine) but rather the overall speed and responsiveness of the interface. I want something with a real QWERTY and multitasking that takes advantage of the kind of hardware that is clearly common in these high end devices like the Pre and the iWhatevers.

If you liked the Centro then your gonna love the Pixi. The only big adjustment would be your data plan since it mandates simply everything period now.

This is dead on. My girlfriend was upgrading from a Treo 755p to a Pixi and she loves it. Took a little while to get a hang of the Gesture area and copy/paste. But it was the perfect fit for her.

Also Migrating from the Treo to the Pixi was a huge pain in the butt. The gf used the color coding of the Treo calendar to get a quick look at her schedule. So I had to find a way to export the calendar data by category and then upload it to Google Calendar (Palm Desktop -> Outlook -> Export to Excel, then filter and create a sheet per category, upload to Google) so that each category would have it's own color. The contacts were easier, I just used the Palm Transfer tool to move them all to Gmail's contacts. She didn't miss many apps from Palm OS but transferring Ringtones was another hurdle to get over. Not to mention downgrading her iTunes to 9.0.1 so she could sync music and photos.

Not the easiest task for any feature phone user. but then again they'll prob have sprint transfer most of the contacts and pictures.

Tim

How much does an iPhone weigh? I don't think comparing to an iPod Touch tells much of a story.

I've been a Pre user since launch day and have been trying to get my wife interested in one as well. While she admired it from afar she was never quite interested in it enough (her phone at the time was a LG Rumor and it did exactly what she needed it to do.)

When the Pixi started to appear on the scene she was instantly attracted to it. I think this article accurately reflects the target audience. My wife is not a power user or a gadget guru. She likes new and innovative things but they have to be simple and accessible. The Pixi suited that niche pretty well. She's happy with it.

I actually enjoy using it myself. Honestly, I think it is snappier than my Pre at times and it definitely gets better battery life. At first there seemed to be a brightness issue but then I realized her default brightness level was set in the middle. I set it to the max and now it seems to compare favorably to my Pre.

same experience here. Palm have created a phone (lets not forget it's a phone, not a computer) that offers outstanding features and design.. and I picked one up for $25 on a new contract. Outstanding, $25 dollars for all that?

LMAO - That is a fantastic link!!! I'm gonna use that in the forums...

I keep forgetting, why are we supposed to care about the Pixi? Doesn't it merit a pixicentral.com?

LOL. I think PreCentral.net rolls off the tongue better than webOsCentral.net.

how about palmCentral...

Not to get too far off topic, but PalmCentral.com is owned by Handango and I don't see them being nice enough to sell the URL to Smartphone Experts and an affordable rate.

Tim

how about "WebOSCentral" ?? :)

Back on topic, the Pixi (which I haven't tried yet) would seem like the perfect upgrade to the Centro which:

-Didn't have wifi (and didn't need)
-Was candy bar styled
-Was touch screen
-Was smaller that the other Treos

I might swing by the Sprint shop to try it out for a bit.

What about palmcentral.net?

Nice write up. I completely agree. My wife & I 'upgraded' in July. I got the Pre & she went with the the Treo Pro (because she didn't like the recessed keys of the pre). Both of us were coming from 755p's. I love my pre & she HATES the Pro. Win Mo is so ridiculous compared to Web OS. I wish I had known. Loves the functionality & user experience of the Web OS. Now that the Pixi is out she is very interested. She is not a power user & probably wouldn't notice any difference in speed & lack of WiFi as our 3G coverage is great usually. I want to get her one so badly but used our upgrade credit already so I'd have to pay the full retail of $400 Something. That might be too much. I plan on calling & begging Sprint for a discount It's sad really because even Sprint knows the Pro is a piece of junk because they won't buy it back for more than $15 I believe.

I up for an upgrade now and plan to get the Pixie for my wife, she didn't like my Pre due to the 4-6 times I've exchanged it, when I lost all my contacts and now dropped it and it cracked...lol So i told her she would get it with the case/glove, to protect the droppings.

She's waiting for her phone...as I type...lol

I had the treo750w and then the treo 800 and I use it for business. I don't know what constitutes a "power user" but I'm definitely not new to smart phones. After trying it at the sprint store I'm interested in the pixi because it's an upgrade from the treo line. I have wifi now and never use it. WebOS is a huge upgrade from WM and BB's OS is worse than windows. The more usable touch screen and the size of the device are also improvements over treo. Although the name is geared more towards non-professionals, the design of the pixi is more like a blackberry whereas the pre looks like a jellybean/toy. For me as long as it syncs with my business email/contacts/calendar in outlook and has GPS it will meet my needs. Syncing with my personal webmail/calendar is bonus. The performance differences btwn pre and pixi seem slight.

Although miss Wifi is a big minus, I think Pixi has an overall positive effect on Palm and WebOS. For the minimum, it exposes new users to WebOS and hopefully some of them will move to Pre or Pre II when they feel comfortable enough with WebOS. It also sets up a wall against new users to move to iPhone, because once they get spoiled by the multitasking, I doubt they can move to an iPhone. Of course, in a year, multitasking could show up on iPhone. I also think iPhone has to do it, otherwise, they are going to be killed by WebOS, Android, etc.

You know, I used to agree

Great article. I agree, the Pixi is tempting because it's a great a phone first, with decent smartphone capabilities. It can do all that in a thin sexy package. Ok, no wifi, but I never use that on the iPhone and I doubt i'll ever need more than 3 cards open at once. Coming from a Treo 650, to first-gen iPhone, to a Blackberry Curve (work), I think the Pixi will be perfect for my needs. And at $25 it's really hard to pass up. I tried the Pixi at the Sprint store and was thoroughly impressed with its snappiness and build quality. I think for phonecall use, text messaging, gmail check, maps, occasional surfing, it works really well and is much more useable than my Blackberry. I think it's got a gorgeous industrial design and it feels really great in the hand (I always feel like i'll drop the Pre, and the Pre feels just so much more fragile).

My son loves his Pixi (15). I can not tell you how much he loves being able to watch youtube, surf the real web and txt like a beast. All of this talk of lag and no wifi etc etc means absolutely nothing to him. He has a great device that does everything his old phone couldn't.

I have had the Pixi for about a week now and I have to say that with a few tweeks, you reall won't miss the wifi if you live in a generous 3G covered area.

I gave up the pre since I exchanged it 4 times with hardware issues. The Pixi is a nice, thin, powerful little phone that should be checked out.

I must say that now that I am used to the new shape, the keyboard alone was worth the switch.