Palm Posts Q3 FY09 Results | webOS Nation
 
 

Palm Posts Q3 FY09 Results 11

by Dieter Bohn Thu, 19 Mar 2009 4:24 pm EDT

As expected, Palm's Quarter 3 for Financial Year 2009 results are not pretty:

Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ:PALM) today reported that total revenue in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, ended Feb. 27, 2009, was $90.6 million. Smartphone sell-through for the quarter was 482,000 units, down 42 percent year over year. Smartphone revenue was $77.5 million, down 72 percent from the year-ago period.

"We're proceeding through a challenging transitional period, however our current results shouldn't overshadow the tremendous progress we've made against our strategic goals. We're poised to usher in a new era at Palm," said Ed Colligan, Palm president and chief executive officer.

"Challenging transitional period" is a nice way to say it, we'd go it "An incredibly tenuous, high-stakes tightrope walk over shark infested waters.  Said sharks bearing names like RIM, Apple, and Google."  Nevertheless, Palm did provide warning that these results would look pretty much like they do, but it's still disheartening to not only see Palm lose money (Net loss for common shareholders: $98 million, or $0.89 per share), but also see a significant drop in the number of smartphone units they've sold.

Of course, Palm has been in hunker-down mode, working on getting the Palm Pre released.  Release they shall before half of 2009 is out (we still don't have a date and don't expect to hear one during the call), but while the release of the Pre will help Palm's cash situation, it's not going to make a huge bump in the balance sheet, as we just noted.  Cash on hand at the end of the 3rd quarter: $219.4 million, though that doesn't seem to include the $89.3 million they just picked up.  Palm burned through $92.1 million in cash in Q3, so they are definitely playing things pretty close right now.

More soon, full press release after the break.

 

SUNNYVALE, Calif., Mar 19, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ:PALM) today reported that total revenue in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, ended Feb. 27, 2009, was $90.6 million. Smartphone sell-through for the quarter was 482,000 units, down 42 percent year over year. Smartphone revenue was $77.5 million, down 72 percent from the year-ago period.

"We're proceeding through a challenging transitional period, however our current results shouldn't overshadow the tremendous progress we've made against our strategic goals. We're poised to usher in a new era at Palm," said Ed Colligan, Palm president and chief executive officer.

Net loss applicable to common shareholders for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 was $(98.0) million, or $(0.89) per diluted common share. Net loss applicable to common shareholders included stock-based compensation of $5.3 million, amortization of intangible assets of $0.9 million, restructuring charges of $5.7 million, a casualty loss of $5.0 million, an impairment of non-current auction rate securities of $4.0 million, a gain on a series C derivative of $20.6 million and accretion of series B and series C preferred stocks of $3.0 million. This compares to a net loss applicable to common shareholders for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 of $(57.0) million or $(0.53) per diluted common share, which included stock-based compensation of $6.2 million, amortization of intangible assets of $1.0 million, restructuring charges of $12.3 million, an impairment of non-current auction rate securities of $25.5 million and accretion of series B preferred stock of $2.4 million.

Net loss for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, measured on a non-GAAP(1) basis, totaled $(94.7) million, or $(0.86) per diluted share, excluding stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, a casualty loss, an impairment of non-current auction rate securities, a gain on a series C derivative and accretion of series B and series C preferred stocks. This compares to a non-GAAP net loss for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 of $(17.0) million, or $(0.16) per diluted share, which excluded the effects of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, an impairment of non-current auction rate securities, accretion of series B preferred stock and an adjustment to the related tax provision.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 totaled $(81.9) million. EBITDA, adjusted to add back stock-based compensation, net other income (expense), restructuring charges, a casualty loss, an impairment of non-current auction rate securities and a gain on a series C derivative, or Adjusted EBITDA, totaled $(78.6) million.

Cash used in operations for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 was $(92.1) million. The company's cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments balance was $219.4 million at the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2009.

Palm recently announced the closing of a public offering of common stock and the associated exercise of its underwriters' over-allotment option. In total, approximately 26.6 million shares were sold in the offering, including shares subject to the over-allotment option and approximately 18.5 million common shares underlying 49 percent of the units of series C preferred stock and warrants acquired by Elevation Partners in January 2009, for a public offering price of $6.00 per share. Elevation Partners, which recouped the $49 million it originally paid for its units included in the offering, used those funds to purchase approximately 8.2 million shares of Palm's common stock in the offering at the public offering price. In total, Palm received estimated net proceeds of approximately $103.6 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, estimated offering expenses and the original purchase price of Elevation Partners' units.

Separately, Palm indicated that since it expects to periodically provide new software features free of charge to customers of its Palm(R) webOS(TM) products, including the recently announced Palm Pre(TM), it will recognize Palm webOS product revenues and related standard costs of revenues on a subscription basis based on the applicable product's estimated economic life, which is currently 24 months. The company will be recording deferred revenues and deferred costs of revenues on its balance sheet, and amortizing them into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life. Certain administrative and other related period costs of revenues will be expensed as incurred. This accounting policy will have no impact on cash flows and does not change how Palm accounts for Palm OS(R) products, like the Centro(TM), or its Treo(TM) line. A more detailed discussion of the new accounting treatment can be found on Palm's Investor Relations website at http://investor.palm.com.

 

 

Category:
Tags:

11 Comments

It does bring into question the level of support and development they will be able to sustain. Most handsets lose money for their makers for the first year. With an untested and new OS it is going to be a rocky ride.

IF they can pull of a good launch - and not get crushed by Apple's new hardware in June/July - and can keep the features rolling into WebOS for the 1st gen PRE, they might be able to pull through. Still though, it's going to be a hard, up-hill battle that they are just starting!

It will be interesting to see how things play out since WebOS is targeting a different user-group then iPhone is (READ: cheesy games and farting "pull-my-finger" apps and crappy subscription services won't work here!).

Apple has no commented on releasing new hardware in June, only 3.0 OS release.

The iphone and Windows Mobile are is targeted more to the upscale and business user, yes, and the Pre users, being the "big fat middle" will be less of a techno savvy group, but problems will still be problems, and depth of support does depend on money and cash on hand.

Subscription services like iTunes don't work? Looks like a billion dollar successful business model to me.

Sorry, I didn't clarify that it won't work *for me*. I've stayed away from the iPhone because of that and stuck with the PalmOS since it has a more *useful*, freeware community. I don't need a device with iFart as much as I need one that will do things like Push email and PIM exceptionally well.

I don't know how you can say business users are all for the iPhone though since it has been lacking things such as push email but I'll take your word for it!

Your obsession with "iFart" as if that is your understanding of the iPhone explains your attitude. Such garbage has existed with PalmOS, Windows Mobile, and will for WebOS. So shall we dismiss all those based on some idiot applications?

Your statement on push email means you haven't ever used an iPhone. I don't use an iPhone but I at least know some facts.

Push email works on the iPhone perfectly as do all the major enterprise requirements, and this is why Apple has been making strong inroads into enterprise.

That and the fact that they have a well funded and large team of employees whose only job is to assist in enterprise uptake and integration. I know because although I am WM, I have dealt with their enterprise IT integration team.

Who slow down Mr Inroads! iPhone just became push email and calendar sync friendly when as it relates to Outlook/Exchange. You can push your Outlook calendar and email to your iPhone, but not the other direction, which is pretty much what my Samsung Instinct does. The Pre will have active-sync (Synergy).

I definitely do not consider iPhone nearly on the same level as technologically aptitude as RIM or Palm, but more so than Samsung or Nokia! Considering their claim to fame is a bunch of low tech apps, games, the iPod, and to be honest useless apps, they do not belong in the same category as Windows Mobile or Blackberry.
I still really don't consider iPhone a smartphone because of it's lack of home/office applications (e.g. Office Suite, etc). The iPhone is a multimedia phone. I mean, there really is no difference in the iPhone and iPod touch, besides the phone. They both run the same apps and have web capability. In fact they both will run iPhone 3.0 soon, with the same bundle of updates.

Wow, Palm guys are not doing their homework. Apple supports full MS ActiveSync - TWO-way synching. I do push TWO-way today with MobileMe and Entourage (without Exchange ActiveSync) and I'm able to do everything I need on the enterprise level with PIM activities.

iPhone isn't a SmartPhone? Just because you can't edit 20 page Word docs or Excel files makes it less of a phone? Just idiotic. When was the last time you edited a doc (not just update two or three words) on a mobile phone?

Palm has a bit more than $216 million in cash, Apple has nearly $30 BILLION in cash. iPhone 3.0 and OS 3.0 will launch on June 8th, coinciding with a predicted sold-out Worldwide Developers Conference.

Finally, Flash on Pre won't make it a game device. You need native hardware level access to the GPU and CPU to build games like Rolondo, Metal Gear Solid, Pocket God or the Sims. Also, how do you package and SELL an application that has everything open to anyone in a index.html and a few .js files?

Everyone outside of the Apple ecosystem keeps forgetting, the iPhone is not successful because of it's hardware, software or App Store - it's the combination of all three that make it successful. if Apple didn't have an App Store, sales would be much less. If they had crappy software, no one would buy it. If the hardware was glitchy, it would be called Centro.

Pre is dead in the water. They'll get killed by the hundreds of thousands of developers, over 25,000 apps and nearly 1 BILLION downloads, just in the first TEN months! Apple makes more money in ONE month on the App Store than Palm makes in total for the same quarter.

Yikes.

Wow, dude, what part of "*for me*" didn't you pick up on? Clearly he's just giving his perspective - nothing more! So what if some of us don't want to join the Apple-cult? At least give the Pre a chance before you go bashing it!

Oh, and at least we don't hide behind "Anonymous" all the time either!

I think the Pre will be more a gaming and multimedia market. IPhone is has been picked up by business now for quite some time.

It would seem logical that the Palm Pre upcoming launch is hurting Palm. I liked the 800w, but it had some serious-enough flaws that I didn't buy it. When I heard about the Pro, I was really excited. I was fully ready to buy the Pro when it was released. But, when I heard about the Pre, I decided to hold off a little longer and get the Pre instead. I imagine there are many others out there who are waiting on the Pre before they invest/reinvest in Palm.