The TouchPad and MRI: Works like no other (thanks to plastic) | webOS Nation
 
 

The TouchPad and MRI: Works like no other (thanks to plastic) 36

by Riz Parvez Tue, 06 Dec 2011 9:31 pm EST

Without a doubt, the design choices HP made with regard to the TouchPad were largely panned by the tech community:Why so much plastic? Couldn’t they have made it thinner?

While these criticisms hold absolutely true in the consumer space, specialty applications in enterprise continue to show themselves as an entirely different ballgame.

Remember enterprise? Surely this was one of the most promising prospects for webOS under the stewardship of HP. While the last several months of tumult have left much of that potential still untapped, a post today from John Kneeland on the HP webOS Developer Blog certainly goes a long way to rekindle the imagination of how beautifully webOS, and the much maligned hardware of the TouchPad, can work like no other in one industry: Healthcare.

First, a little background: Technological applications in healthcare are constantly advancing. Researchers are always trying to improve practitioners’ ability to prevent, diagnose, treat, and cure disease. One field on the cutting edge of the interface between technology and health is Interventional Radiology (IR). IR specialists use multiple technologies like Magnetic Resonance (MR), Ultrasound (US), and Computed Tomography (CT) to visualize disease processes, then intervene to change the course of an illness.

One fascinating example of this that will be near-and-dear to the hearts (and possibly other organs) of the webOS community comes by way of Stanford University IR Researcher Andrew B. Holbrook. Holbrook, a researcher with multiple publications on the subject of IR, noticed a significant shortcoming with the tech being used in the MR suite to conduct a cutting-edge procedure called High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). Due to the nature of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, there were significant limitations to the kinds of devices that could be used near the scanner: Hard disks wipe, and metallic objects quickly become projectiles in response to the magnetic field generated by the scanner, which functions at an intensity 30,000 to 60,000 times that of the Earth. In this highly demanding environment, Holbrook found himself relegated to the use of clunky devices and inelegant workarounds to effectively conduct scans.

Until the TouchPad and webOS, that is.

With it’s minimal use of glue and plastic-intensive housing, the TouchPad was already ahead of it’s rivals with regard to usability near an MR scanner. Following some further modifications to remove the vibrating motor and the speakers (with the help of HP’s hardware engineers, no less), Holbrook was able to adapt the TouchPad into the ideal device for use within the MR suite.

As it turns out, webOS and its supporters were also a perfect fit for Holbrook. With some help from the dev community, Holbrook was able to write several trick PDK applications to control the equipment and monitor patients, all without leaving the field.  Of course his apps are all easily viewable in concert thanks to webOS’s best-in-class multitasking, and he’s even been able to make some of them backward compatible all the way to the Pixi. Take that, fragmentation.

So what’s next for Holbrook and webOS? Given the success he’s had so far with webOS and the TouchPad, he hopes to continue to develop further applications, and even begin using our favorite OS and tablet in Stanford Radiology clinical trials in the very near future. Seems like an OS that gives life support, rather than one that’s on it.

Category:

36 Comments

Fitting really. What with webOS being on life support...

-Suntan

c'mon! Live! Damnit!

I haven't heard Bones say, "he's dead, Jim" just yet.

I'm a doctor, not a webOS program--oh wait...

This is what I've been talking about ever since Leo cut the nuts off of webOS. I even used the medical industry as my main example. Just think of how many machines are in one hospital!

Remember when Hurd said they didn't buy webOS to get into the mobile phone business? He wasn't lying. They bought webOS for ENTERPRISE solutions, not consumers. The TouchPad was supposed to be sold in bulk to corporations but HP screwed up so bad they couldn't even do that.

The only hope webOS has for consumers is if HP refocuses (doubtful) and actually puts in an effort to compete. Probably though they'll just absorb it into enterprise and we'll never see a webOS or tablet again.

For those of you hoping HP sells webOS to someone that will make phones that will NOT happen. If HP manages to sell it to someone it will most likely be for the patents.

This is exactly the market HP should have been focusing the TouchPad on all along to create an "install base" before bringing it to the consumer market. Regardless...very impressive stuff.

I have to disagree with you and sweet greggo regarding the enterprise vs consumer markets.

The consumer market can't be ignored for a tablet. It's necessary to get the volume of sales necessary to keep cost under control.

Also, regardless of how much HP consider the tablet market as the main thing - they can't ignore the smartphone market.

Apple had a very solid smartphone base before they had their mega-success with the IPad.

People don't want to buy one app for system A and then another for system B. Even more than costs it's annoying when you have to use different systems from one minute to the next.

If HP tries to keep webos tablet only they will loose (again). Android and IOS would always have the advantage of the wider ecosystem.

Of course HP could opt to revive tablets and licence webos on smartphones to a partner (or rather sell webos to a partner and re-licence webos for tablets back as part of the deal)

"Apple had a very solid smartphone base before they had their mega-success with the IPad."
...even so, let's do not forget, that "mega-success" is easily dwarfed by their phone's sales. Comparing to the iPhone, iPad is still small potatoes.

Mobile OS, without hitting hard in smartphones FIRST, does not make any sense at all. Remember that, Meg of HP. You need successful phone/s FIRST. Your leadership seem to have a hard time in grasping that. Nobody cares about tablets in comparison to smartphones, the sell ratio of smartphones to tablets is, like, roughly, about, circa infinity to one.

See, it had to be good for something. HP wouldn't make it fingerprint-magnet plastic for no reason.

They should make cheaper plastic version for cost-conscious consumers and medical and industrial applications working with magnets, and a metal version for all the people who won't stop whining about the plastic.

The glossy remains a stupid idea - that has nothing to with being plastic or not.

But it's amusing that the plastic case turns out to be an advantage here (considering how much some forum folks here considered that a super-fail-feature).

The plastic is also necessary in order to implement Touchstone compatibility -- IMO a killer feature and a key differentiator, which HP did not promote at all. (I know, I know -- add it to the laundry list of things HP screwed-up.)

I never understood the whining about the TP hardware. The hardware is fine. That's it. It's not history-making, but in the context of consumer electronics, it's fine. My sister has an iPad2, and I'm not jealous of the hardware at all -- she has a thinner metal tablet, and I have one that is Touchstone-compatible. It's a wash IMO.

"The plastic is also necessary in order to implement Touchstone compatibility "
no it is not - of course there are metals that are permeable to electro-magnetic fields - like for example (you guess it) - aluminium.

But even if it was true, small opening of the size of the induction coil, covered with plastic would do

Also, finding a very, very, VERY specific use case that confirms how "useful" plastic case is, man, that is the very definition of being biased. You can ALWAYS find some specific use case for something very inadequate to a broad market. Would you build your broad-market strategy on that? Well, if you are stupid as HP, than why not.

I still say carbon fiber would be better!

I totally agree :thumbsup: !!!

Cool use of the TouchPad. I very much agree that webOS could thrive in both healthcare and education. In healthcare, I would love to be able to have a patient's medical history in one card, their radiographs in another card while easily accessing the appointment screen in a third card. Put these cards into a stack for each patient, and you could easily manage your patient records. With some improvements to webOS, I could also see dragging a radiograph image onto an email to send for a quick consult.

Education also would benefit from having multiple books open, Just type searches across notes from multiple classes, etc. Programs like Glimpse scream for classroom use, where class text or slides are open in one frame while notes are being taken in another. Oh, the possibilties......

Rather than dragging a radiograph image onto an email you could just have an action to email, similar to how memos can be emailed.

While the plastic on the TP is good for MR, the screen isn't really useful for healthcare. The resolution is to low to diagnose, and the whole screen thing is simply not good enough for diagnosis. As far as I know, monitors need to have a certain approval for healthcare, leading to excellent color fidelity etc. - imagine you diagnose a patient wrong because the colors are not matching those on a certified monitor...

The little OS that could.. pretty darn cool

That's a neat story.

Unless HP (or someone else) provides new hardware, the work of this RA can't really go anywhere.

Just a wild thought, can the TouchPad be recharged / fast recharged during the MRI scan, by the MRI equipment?

I suspect the inductive charging coil is another part that they removed.

I was wondering why they didn't mention that part being removed though...

somebody tell Andrew B. Holbrook about Glimpse! - instead of switching among apps, each of his apps could display together on the same screen.

Wow... it's great to see some good news on this site for a change.

I really hope that there is someone at HP getting success stories like this in front of the decision makers. Who knows, perhaps this could be a niche that helps the TouchPad get the foothold that it couldn't seem to get earlier.

Crossing my fingers for additional good news in the future...

I have just one word for you "Plastics"

Are you trying to seduce me Mrs. Robinson?

Can't help but think of Monty Python...Meaning of Life Scene..
Yes. More apparatus, please, nurse: the E.E.G., the B.P. monitor, and the A.V.V And, uh, get the That Touchpad that goes 'ping'.

I am a physician. Many moons ago I used my Handspring Visor Deluxe with a keyboard and an IR printer adaptor in the hospital to print documents. I used to dictate into my Treo 700P and used Dragon to transcribe into the chart. I now have a Touchpad and use Splashtop to get access to the electronic medical record and medical imaging on my hospital desktop. Not bad, but not as good as using Citrix. My healthcare system is all HP, from desktops to printers. We even have a few Slates floating around. But the lack of Citrix Receiver is a downer for the Touchpad. Most are using iPad2 to do what the TP cannot. So close, but so far....And so many residents and students now have white coats with iPad/TP sized pockets built in. The healthcare world is waiting, Meg.

There exists Citrix receiver, but it doesn't support https secure URLs, which is necessary to access hospital electronic medical record software, or any other corporate Citrix farm. This lack of functionality makes the TouchPad useless for me at work. One would think this would be "simple" for Citrix and/or HP to fix.

not only simple, but also promised. Two things that HP will never do.

they already laid of all the webos hardware engineers...
the irony of this is all a bit striking, for some of the same reasons others have pointed out as well.

Wouldn't want to trust my health to a jury rigged webos device.

interesting article & a good omen for webOS getting continued support from HP
surely they must recognize the importance of mobile computing for enterprise sales which place a premium on security as well as integration
webOS has many advantages & their three mobile computers that use it were a good start, albeit hamstrung by Apothekar's Folly
Meg Whitman, having worked at Disney & Hasbro, should understand that fun drives the consumer market & that consumer products promote computer developments enjoyed by enterprise
fix the Touchpad's accelerometer!

"(...)a good omen for webOS getting continued support from HP"

yep, their support is simply world-leading and class on it's own. Like, ehem, webOS backup servers being unavailable for over ONE WEEK, before anyone in HP bothered to **** in their direction and fix things. Or no updates to European GSM Pre 3, while being nice overall, is bug-ridden, and behind US version of the firmware, and never received OTA.

Yep, that is HP's version of holding to their promises of "continued support to their existing customers".

F you HP, you stink.

Absolutely awesome!!! Like others have said above, webOS is perfect for the professional! I know many doctors that were excited about the possibilities of webOS in their field but were crushed when things took a turn for the worst. Im still ticked off about Citrix not working properly. We need revitalization in the Enterprise space. There is still time!